Mile Square Park is across the street from Mom Supermarket, which would be ideal for any Buddhist who draws at the Park, since Mom's has a Kosher Buddhist food section. I was arrested there twice in one week, for an alleged violation of California Penal Code section (t) on two consecutive Sundays, (April 23, 2017, and again, on April 30, 2017, additionally I was threatened with arrest, there, two times (twice, on April 28, 2017, and again on May 1, 2017 at the police station by the Internal Affairs intake officer, "...you better find some place else to hang out, if you go there again you will be arrested again.)" Since I am not a criminal, and have not violated any of the laws of the City of Santa Ana or of the State of California, I am guessing that the cops have a deal with the parking lot security company to harass observers who might witness their rackets. The money that cops get from the body parts dealer, for the kids they steal from strip mall parking lot cars, is enough to make it worth the risk of losing their badge. The Mom Supermarket parking lot is a favorite of kick-back criminals, I was robbed there, the police responded by calling me names, asking the guard who robbed me, "Is she crazy," and telling me that I instigated the theft (of my computer bag, camera bag, and purse, off of my bike), by a man who I had reported attempted it before, and then, while I was on the phone to the cop who I had reported the attempted robbery to, completed the attemp: The security guard signaled the man and his accomplice to cut my bags off of my bike and run. The responding lady cop told me that I was lucky I didn't follow after them, because I would have been shot, (by her?) Later the guard tried to sell my stuff back to me.
This 'nun,' steals pets and kids out of cars, and then sells them as in need of adoption, unlawful adoptions are common in California because we have such a glut of illegal immigrants:
The Mom Supermarket security guard mentioned to me that this 'nun' had called the police to get rid of me; because I had refused to help her break into cars. I told him that the parking lot guard had assaulted me.
The Landhousing Security guard, who did not identify himself and whose name I do not know, assaulted me:
(landhousingsecurity@gmail.com) (Land Housing Security Services San Bernardino, CA 92404 – YP.com) (https://www.facebook.com/Land-Housing-Security-Service-156276157395317...) (http://www.yellowpages.com/san-bernardino-ca/mip/land-housing-security...(Land Housing Security, at 2601 Del Rosa Ave Ste 222f, San Bernardino, CA.)
He threatened to shoot me, (see photo and tape 170410-1590), on May 2, 2017, while I was parking my bike at Mom Supermarket, 5111 Edinger Ave. Santa Ana, Ca., 92704. (714) 839-3939. I parked my bike, and there he verbally assaulted me and gestured as if to shoot me:
I had gone to the market to get my phone activated, as my service provider is inside of the Market. The crazy security guard, who has already had me arrested on a false trespassing charge twice, came at me shouting in Spanish, while holding up his arm as if he had a gun in his hand, yelling, "Pish, Pish, Pish," (Pow, Pow, Pow?') While blasting at me with his hand, he continued yelling in Spanish. I called 911. The false arrests put a c-note in his pocket, because the City pays $100 for information leading to an arrest. Security guards cash in on that bounty, because the arrest does not have to lead to a conviction, and their cop friends will split the c-note: So if you count both arrests the guards (a different signer on each Citizen Arrest form) got one hundred bucks each and gave fifty bucks each time to the arresting officer who submits the paperwork to request the c-note from the City Council. I was charged with California Penal Code section 602 Trespass (t) (1) (2) a felony that requires prior convictions at that location, I have no convictions at any location. Both arrests, on Sunday April 23, and again on April 30, 2017 are pure buffoonery, interestingly when I went to jail the second time, on April 30, 2017, the booking officer told me, "...this is your third arrest, you were arrested on Tuesday as well..." No, I was not in Santa Ana on Tuesday, I was threatened with arrest twice on Friday. Evidently I missed the attempt to unlawfully arrest me on Tuesday, so, their plans changed, and they tried in vein on Friday, succeeding only on the following Sunday. Busy busy busy. On both arrests Santa Ana Police Department arresting officers insisted that the criteria is separable from the charge, a total of six cops insist that there is no criteria, as it is separable, and determined to simply ignore that part of the code, while calling me a "dirty transient:" the Internal Affairs Officer stated regarding the first arrest (see tape) that the criteria is not separable from the code, but after the second arrest changed his mind and threatened me with a future arrest. I reported him, to his superior sgt., so, I'm guessing that he was persuaded to change his mind back again. And that may be the end of it. I have asked several lawyers to give a succinct analysis of the dilemma:
Dear Legal Beagles, I
was arrested twice, first on Sunday April 23, 2017, and again on the
following Sunday, April 30, 2017, for a violation of CPC section 602
(t), which requires prior convictions at that specific location; Mom
Supermarket, 5111 W. Edinger St, Santa Ana, CA: I have no convictions
at any location, the Landhousing security guard, and the Market manager sighed the Citizen Arrest forms, and subsequent to the arrests, on May 2, 2017, the landhousing parking lot security guard assaulted me by making a shooting gesture with his hand, while yelling, "Pish, Pish, Pish:"
California
Penal Code section 602: Trespass
(t)
(1) Entering upon private property, including contiguous land,
real
property, or structures thereon belonging to the same owner,
whether
or not generally open to the public, after having been
informed
by a peace officer at the request of the owner, the owner's
agent,
or the person in lawful possession, and upon being informed by
the
peace officer that he or she is acting at the request of the
owner,
the owner's agent, or the person in lawful possession, that
the
property is not open to the particular person; or refusing or
failing
to leave the property upon being asked to leave the property
in
the manner provided in this subdivision.
(2)
This subdivision applies only to a person who has been
convicted
of a crime committed upon the particular private property.
California
Penal Code section 602: Trespass “...Subdivisions shall not apply
to persons on the premises who are engaging in activities protected
by the California or United States Constitution.
Additionally
on Friday of the same week, (April 28, 2017) a Santa Ana Police
Officer rolled up on me (below) at the Mom Supermarket strip mall and told me
that he was going to arrest me for the same trespassing charge, he said he was
going to get a translator because the guard who was signing the
Citizen Arrest form did not speak English; the Officer never
returned.
Officer Poling and his fellow officer left happy, telling me that I could stay at the strip mall for as long as like, in whatever endeavor I chose to pursue (just like it says in the Constitution): At the time I was waiting for a friend who was shopping inside of the Market, then we left.
When I came back on Sunday, April 30, 2017, one of the Landhousing guards, a Mr. Corona, went off on me, demanding that I submit to an interrogation, I walked away; he followed me, I told him that his endless dogging constituted harassment, he apologized, and said, "Can I talk to you (while sticking his phone pad camera in my face)." I said yes, he tried to contrive a panhandling confession out of me, "I know how much money you make here, I saw a dollar in your bag." My red mesh grocery tote. I pointed out that when Buddhists give a nun a dollar, it's tradition, not soliciting; soliciting and panhandling are defined in the California Penal Code as 'accosting' someone for money. Since I never accost anyone for anything, nor even talk to anyone, unless it's to someone engaging me in a conversation about Temple matters, I am not soliciting nor am I panhandling. If he saw a dollar in my grocery tote or hat, it's because I am Buddhist; another Buddhist put it there in keeping with tradition. (The scriptures say that if you do not show compassion for the suffering of all sentient beings, in particular nuns by giving them a dollar, you will reincarnate as a pauper. -I'm a pauper, and frankly I don't think it's such a bad fate. Rich people have much bigger money worries. I have no money worries because I have no money, except to meet the basic necessities of life.)
The other two Landhousing guards, one very old Mexican, and one middle aged Mexican who bothers everyone, had yelled at me as well, on numerous occasions, including the occasion of the first arrest, but I could not be sure of what they meant, since I don't speak Spanish. The guard who gestured as if to shoot me, had yelled at me on two occasions gesturing that he had pictures of me, he didn't say why or of what. Maybe he meant that he took pictures of me, a Buddhist, most Mexicans are Catholic, they hate Buddhists. The Market's Catholic solicitor had shoved me into the roadway some times, to make room for her candy cart, (below) but when the market guard saw her do that he told her to stop. Her sign states that she is accepting donations for blind orphans. The Mom Supermarket security guard and employees form a prayer circle with her every time she shows up; they all attend St. Barbar's together. The market guard says that she knows everyone and is very popular and very wealthy, "She just comes here to meet with her beneficiaries, she is very very wealthy, this is just something that she does to keep busy."
There are many of them, they are at every market in town, moving by bus, every two hours, to the next market, I doubt that there is an orphanage.
The reality is that the old woman's kids put her out on the street to beg because she has TB and they are tired of her penniless hacking at home all of the time, her husband is equally destitute, and sick, he rides a bike. Unfortunately she cross contaminates the candy packages by opening them and having people grab a sample, she uses her hand for a cleanx, before reaching into the opened box. Her kids are horrible ingrates, in pricy cars, making the elders fork over their daily cash grab of about five hundred dollars;
White Tigers gang put's down time prostitutes (recovering from varies STDs) in doorways to sell trinkets. Vietnamese Buddhist gang girl clerics make ten thousand dollars for the same effort as the old people who are put on the street by their kids; the White Tigers girls laugh at the 'blind orphan,' racketeers and shove them out of the doorways. No one bothers me because I just rest, in the parking lot on the island, under a shade tree, and people leave me alone. Doorway turf wars always end in casualties.
Everyone in this picture (below) belongs to a gang that is at war over the doorway turf:
Eventually the 'nun' seated (center) battled with a bag lady, (below) poisoned her, she lived for about six months, but fell victim to several adversaries.
Mr. Corona asked me to be so kind as to come only when he is not working, "any other time except between 4:PM, and 8:PM," I told him that until I get my phone activated I have no way to call and let people who are expecting to find me there know when to find me.
A short time later Officer Buchannan arrived and Mr. Corona signed a citizen arrest form (trespassing) for the second arrest. Clearly by this time, considering that a previous arrest False Arrest for Trespassing already took place, everyone had time to check the code, (as if they didn't know from the start that I was never a candidate for a trespassing arrest) but given the fact that a second arrest took place, the ticket, and the Citizen Arrest Form will be considered by the court to be perjured statements designed to gain a conviction in the absence of a crime; the cops will be fired; the judge is mandated to take their badges at the time that a perjured statement is presented in court (the ticket and police report).
Officer Buchannan (below) and his partner arrested me on the exact same same charge that Officer Poling and his partner, and their two training officers had arrested me on.
That arrest had occurred on the previous Sunday, April 23, 2017. That gave Internal Affairs seven days before the second arrest of April 30,2017, which is enough time for word to filter down from Internal Affairs that it was a false arrest. The following morning I filed against Officer Buchannan with Internal Affairs; Officer Gutierrez flew into a rage and said, “You were arrested again! You better find some place else to hang out, if you go back there you will be arrested again.” I turned in an IA Complaint about Gutierrez' false arrest threat (to his superior Sgt.) I am guessing he is angry because the judge will snatch his officers' badges for making perjured statements in their police reports. Cops are not allowed to lie that they don't know how to read a code criteria. Nor are they allowed to simply omit it.
A short time later that same evening (April 28, 2017) the officers who had arrested me on April 23, 2017, (below)
arrived to arrest me again, I explained that I had submitted an Internal Affairs Complaint to Officer Gutierrez of Internal
Affairs and he had said that (t) is not divisible from (1) and (2)
"This subdivision applies only to a person who has been
convicted
of a crime committed upon the particular private property."
Additionally, “...Subdivisions ( such a CPC 602: Trespass, section t) shall not apply
to persons on the premises who are engaging in activities protected
by the California or United States Constitution." Therefore, I told the officers who had arrived to arrest me for a second time, 'According to Officer Gutierrez, I did not meet the criteria for an arrest, Gutierrez has deemed it a "Training day procedural error."' Officer Poling commented, "I'm the trainee." I think 'victim' is a more accurate description, since he was suckered into signing his name to the bogus arrest citation. He is good looking and smart, the others don't like that, but more specifically his is honest, which they hate. They probably had him make the arrest in order to ding him. 
Officer Poling and his fellow officer left happy, telling me that I could stay at the strip mall for as long as like, in whatever endeavor I chose to pursue (just like it says in the Constitution): At the time I was waiting for a friend who was shopping inside of the Market, then we left.
When I came back on Sunday, April 30, 2017, one of the Landhousing guards, a Mr. Corona, went off on me, demanding that I submit to an interrogation, I walked away; he followed me, I told him that his endless dogging constituted harassment, he apologized, and said, "Can I talk to you (while sticking his phone pad camera in my face)." I said yes, he tried to contrive a panhandling confession out of me, "I know how much money you make here, I saw a dollar in your bag." My red mesh grocery tote. I pointed out that when Buddhists give a nun a dollar, it's tradition, not soliciting; soliciting and panhandling are defined in the California Penal Code as 'accosting' someone for money. Since I never accost anyone for anything, nor even talk to anyone, unless it's to someone engaging me in a conversation about Temple matters, I am not soliciting nor am I panhandling. If he saw a dollar in my grocery tote or hat, it's because I am Buddhist; another Buddhist put it there in keeping with tradition. (The scriptures say that if you do not show compassion for the suffering of all sentient beings, in particular nuns by giving them a dollar, you will reincarnate as a pauper. -I'm a pauper, and frankly I don't think it's such a bad fate. Rich people have much bigger money worries. I have no money worries because I have no money, except to meet the basic necessities of life.)
The other two Landhousing guards, one very old Mexican, and one middle aged Mexican who bothers everyone, had yelled at me as well, on numerous occasions, including the occasion of the first arrest, but I could not be sure of what they meant, since I don't speak Spanish. The guard who gestured as if to shoot me, had yelled at me on two occasions gesturing that he had pictures of me, he didn't say why or of what. Maybe he meant that he took pictures of me, a Buddhist, most Mexicans are Catholic, they hate Buddhists. The Market's Catholic solicitor had shoved me into the roadway some times, to make room for her candy cart, (below) but when the market guard saw her do that he told her to stop. Her sign states that she is accepting donations for blind orphans. The Mom Supermarket security guard and employees form a prayer circle with her every time she shows up; they all attend St. Barbar's together. The market guard says that she knows everyone and is very popular and very wealthy, "She just comes here to meet with her beneficiaries, she is very very wealthy, this is just something that she does to keep busy."
There are many of them, they are at every market in town, moving by bus, every two hours, to the next market, I doubt that there is an orphanage.
The reality is that the old woman's kids put her out on the street to beg because she has TB and they are tired of her penniless hacking at home all of the time, her husband is equally destitute, and sick, he rides a bike. Unfortunately she cross contaminates the candy packages by opening them and having people grab a sample, she uses her hand for a cleanx, before reaching into the opened box. Her kids are horrible ingrates, in pricy cars, making the elders fork over their daily cash grab of about five hundred dollars;
Same girl, different occupation: Saigon has a 'scanty panty' cafe on every corner, gang girl 'nuns' run rackets there. No shame in her game, she only cares about the Money.
White Tigers gang put's down time prostitutes (recovering from varies STDs) in doorways to sell trinkets. Vietnamese Buddhist gang girl clerics make ten thousand dollars for the same effort as the old people who are put on the street by their kids; the White Tigers girls laugh at the 'blind orphan,' racketeers and shove them out of the doorways. No one bothers me because I just rest, in the parking lot on the island, under a shade tree, and people leave me alone. Doorway turf wars always end in casualties.
Eventually the 'nun' seated (center) battled with a bag lady, (below) poisoned her, she lived for about six months, but fell victim to several adversaries.
Mr. Corona asked me to be so kind as to come only when he is not working, "any other time except between 4:PM, and 8:PM," I told him that until I get my phone activated I have no way to call and let people who are expecting to find me there know when to find me.
A short time later Officer Buchannan arrived and Mr. Corona signed a citizen arrest form (trespassing) for the second arrest. Clearly by this time, considering that a previous arrest False Arrest for Trespassing already took place, everyone had time to check the code, (as if they didn't know from the start that I was never a candidate for a trespassing arrest) but given the fact that a second arrest took place, the ticket, and the Citizen Arrest Form will be considered by the court to be perjured statements designed to gain a conviction in the absence of a crime; the cops will be fired; the judge is mandated to take their badges at the time that a perjured statement is presented in court (the ticket and police report).
Officer Buchannan (below) and his partner arrested me on the exact same same charge that Officer Poling and his partner, and their two training officers had arrested me on.
That arrest had occurred on the previous Sunday, April 23, 2017. That gave Internal Affairs seven days before the second arrest of April 30,2017, which is enough time for word to filter down from Internal Affairs that it was a false arrest. The following morning I filed against Officer Buchannan with Internal Affairs; Officer Gutierrez flew into a rage and said, “You were arrested again! You better find some place else to hang out, if you go back there you will be arrested again.” I turned in an IA Complaint about Gutierrez' false arrest threat (to his superior Sgt.) I am guessing he is angry because the judge will snatch his officers' badges for making perjured statements in their police reports. Cops are not allowed to lie that they don't know how to read a code criteria. Nor are they allowed to simply omit it.
I
was in jail for four hours both times, (thus allowing me to sue for a
violation of Federal Code section 1983: False Arrest, for recovery of
damages in the amount of three million dollars.
Officer B. Poling made the arrest that the above IA Complaint addresses, he is the cute cop (below) who said, "This is such bullshit we shouldn't even be here," under his breath during the arrest, so that the other three dirt-bags-in-blue couldn't hear. I guess 'Training day,' is when the veteran cops corrupt the novice cops: Making Officer Poling a trainee / victim; I'm guessing that they started him out with a false arrest so that they can get rid of him; they only keep the ones who are as dirty as the cops who already went up the ranks. Officer Poling is very honest, he has no hope in hell of fitting in at SAPD, dirt-bag capital of the County. Also he is very bright, so, he is destined for far better things.
Officer B. Poling made the arrest that the above IA Complaint addresses, he is the cute cop (below) who said, "This is such bullshit we shouldn't even be here," under his breath during the arrest, so that the other three dirt-bags-in-blue couldn't hear. I guess 'Training day,' is when the veteran cops corrupt the novice cops: Making Officer Poling a trainee / victim; I'm guessing that they started him out with a false arrest so that they can get rid of him; they only keep the ones who are as dirty as the cops who already went up the ranks. Officer Poling is very honest, he has no hope in hell of fitting in at SAPD, dirt-bag capital of the County. Also he is very bright, so, he is destined for far better things.
Its All About the Bicepts (OMG!)
Regarding the first arrest, of April 23, 2017, Officer Gutierrez of Internal Affairs said that the arresting officer (above) was a trainee and had made a procedural error, rendering the arrest invalid, but, when I submitted a complaint regarding the second arrest (of April 30, 2017), Officer Gutierrez was outraged, “I have it in the system! You were arrested again! Maybe you better find some place else to hang out, if you go back there you will be arrested again.” (What a jack ass Gutierrez is).
I have a smidgen of clout in the CIA, well, so far I have never screwed anything up for them, at least, I could get Officer Poling an invite to apply, and if he does not qualify they will fix that; get him whatever education he is lacking. I'm pretty sure, judging by his tact, he has already got military rank of some sort under his belt, if not, they can get all of that going for him. Being a cop is a no go in the elite forces, they figure you are already too decayed for their purposes, tainted, but Poling has not had time to rot yet, so, better things are yet to come for him. Below is the complaint that I turned in on Officer Buchannan, and his partner:
My Internal Affairs complaint on Gutierrez (below) is for harassing me with the threat of arrest in the absence of a crime, and in the absence of any criteria for an arrest under CPC section 602 (t). I have no convictions for a violation of any law: sub-section two (2) specifies in black and white that I would have to have been convicted of a crime at that location for (t) to be applicable. Unless cops are that stupid, or can't read, what they are really doing is clearing me out so that they can bring in kick-back racketeers; purse snatchers, shoplifter, kidnapper, car jackers, and that sort of thing. It's always about bringing in criminals, gangs, and racketeers who owe them. Disfavored individuals, AKA potential witnesses are invariably criminalized, to make it look like police work is being done, when in fact dirty cops are perpetrating crimes.
I suggested that the police should stick to arresting criminals and individuals who are in the commission of criminal acts, rather than wasting my time, Officer Buchannan countered that in his opinion I was wasting their time.
I read the Code out loud to Officer Buchannan, who responded, "You made that up!" And he was too lazy to look it up, for varification. In the earlier arrest, I made the officers read it out loud at the station, which they did, but they refused to read section (2), so I quoted it to them from memory, "keep reading, I believe the exact working of the next sentence is 'this charge applies only to individuals who have been convicted or a crime at that location.' In any event I thoroughly explained the law to the English speaking guard Mr. Corona, and to each and every of the ten cops who I encountered.
When I came back from IA the next day I put out A Call to Arms to various legal beagle advisors:
Dear Attorneys, The
arresting officers have conjured so many versions of section 602 (t), none of which bare any resemblance to the letter of the law, that I thought you
might like to take a shot at interpreting the code; nailing the
errors in the officers' creations. For starters both arrests were
charged as misdemeanors when, in fact, CPC section 602 (t) is a
felony. (Oh, now that I look closer this citation was left indeterminate as to violation level, figures).
There is a box further down that he checked to distinguish the charge from an infraction, but it is, actually, a felony. The first arrest (above), on April 23, 2017, was creative in that the officer simply dumped section (2) which states that I would have to have been convicted of a crime at that specific location to be charged with a violation of law. I suppose he thought that it was very crafty; to drop (2) and convert CPC 602 code section (t) to a misdemeanor from a felony, which, as far as I know, invalidates the charge as factually inaccurate on it's face. (Cops are not allowed to recreate the codes) At the second arrest, (April 30, 2017) the arresting officer's Mexican partner deemed subsection (2) to be “an enhancement.”(see tape)
Again, this is very creative, if spurious, because enhancements regard sentences not charges. I taped all of the above encounters. I signed the ticket, "Under Duress," which means that the judge has to consider throwing it out, (and invariably will). The police filed the first citation, according to IA Officer Gutierrez, and are going to file the second citation, and a future citation. So far, at both arrests, the officers claimed that the DA does not have to prosecute the case, because it's a 'Citizen Arrest,' and will automatically be prosecuted. (They did not say by whom, certainly the Citizen is not footing the bill; a jury trial costs 80 grand per day.) For the police to state that the Citizen Arrest is out of their hands, and will automatically be prosecuted is a ridiculous thing to assert (why am I not surprised): The arrest citation is signed by a City employee, the arresting police officer, the DA has the authority to refuse to file the charge, if the case is filed in court the cops will lose their badges for making the arrests, because in order to do so the made written perjured statements (the ticket and police report) intending to gain a conviction in the absence of a crime. They do it all of the time, but in this case, they should no have judged a book by it's cover; I am not bag lady du jour, I am a Civil Right Activist, that is what my file says at the PD, it's not like I didn't tell them that before they shot themselves in the foot (they knew that the gun was loaded). Isn't it better, for he tax payer, if a dirt-bag like Officer Buchannan loses his badge for perjured statements in a police report? I hate to see anyone's career trashed, but he brought it on himself.
There is a box further down that he checked to distinguish the charge from an infraction, but it is, actually, a felony. The first arrest (above), on April 23, 2017, was creative in that the officer simply dumped section (2) which states that I would have to have been convicted of a crime at that specific location to be charged with a violation of law. I suppose he thought that it was very crafty; to drop (2) and convert CPC 602 code section (t) to a misdemeanor from a felony, which, as far as I know, invalidates the charge as factually inaccurate on it's face. (Cops are not allowed to recreate the codes) At the second arrest, (April 30, 2017) the arresting officer's Mexican partner deemed subsection (2) to be “an enhancement.”(see tape)
Again, this is very creative, if spurious, because enhancements regard sentences not charges. I taped all of the above encounters. I signed the ticket, "Under Duress," which means that the judge has to consider throwing it out, (and invariably will). The police filed the first citation, according to IA Officer Gutierrez, and are going to file the second citation, and a future citation. So far, at both arrests, the officers claimed that the DA does not have to prosecute the case, because it's a 'Citizen Arrest,' and will automatically be prosecuted. (They did not say by whom, certainly the Citizen is not footing the bill; a jury trial costs 80 grand per day.) For the police to state that the Citizen Arrest is out of their hands, and will automatically be prosecuted is a ridiculous thing to assert (why am I not surprised): The arrest citation is signed by a City employee, the arresting police officer, the DA has the authority to refuse to file the charge, if the case is filed in court the cops will lose their badges for making the arrests, because in order to do so the made written perjured statements (the ticket and police report) intending to gain a conviction in the absence of a crime. They do it all of the time, but in this case, they should no have judged a book by it's cover; I am not bag lady du jour, I am a Civil Right Activist, that is what my file says at the PD, it's not like I didn't tell them that before they shot themselves in the foot (they knew that the gun was loaded). Isn't it better, for he tax payer, if a dirt-bag like Officer Buchannan loses his badge for perjured statements in a police report? I hate to see anyone's career trashed, but he brought it on himself.
-Thank
You, Nancy Wood
Legal Beagle, Veteran Attorney Angela
Jacoby JD responds to the Call to Arms:
"PC 602 is
trespassing generally. Subdivision (t) applies only where the person
has previously committed a crime on the property... They won't be
able to prove it." -AngelaThanks Angela, I'm guessing that they will arrest me and jail me several more times, on the same bogus Trespass charge, which means no immunity for the arresting officers, considering that there were (so far, ten officers) making arrest threats, and 6 actually participating in the two unlawful incarcerations. That's very egregious, it will be a slam dunk in Fed Court on a section 1983: False Arrest. You are wonderful, prompt and insightful. I am happy to recommend you, and will definitely put you at the top of my list of lawyers to retain in the future. -Nancy
The arresting officers know the case won't be filed by the DA, if it is: The perjured police report, and factual inaccuracies will cost them their badges. I taped the arrests, my tape will have no resemblance to the confabulated police report, proving perjured statements in the attempt to gain a wrongful conviction. I mentioned that to Officer Poling and his partner, on our way to the jail, "You can mitigate this, just don't write another chapter in Gone With The Wind, for the police report, keep it succinct." They said that they would. I said, "That's good because the last time I sued the cop had written a three page novella that the judge said looked drug related.
The second arrest (on April 30, 2017) went very very badly (for the cops); they never gave me a chance to tell them I was taping, in fact the recorder was still recording the next day when I got it back from Property Retrieval: Needless to say it is a nightmare of police misconduct and procedural violations. Not the worst of which is that the officers deliberately left my bike unlocked where it could be stolen, rather than taking into the police station for safe keeping. We actually had a conversation about the likelihood that that the officer's gang buds would get it.
Regarding my 911 call of May 2, 2017, the Landhousing Security guard who threatened to shoot me probably figured that he would provoke me into a confrontation and have me arrested for a disturbance of the peace. He had been verbally assaulting shoppers and passers by for two months, the purpose could not be other than to provoke an arrest, in the absence of a crime. Assuming that he was not merely trying to gain the reputation of being an asinine clown.
While I waited, a friend's daughter talked to me about her Armenian dance classes, her dad bought groceries (see tape 17410-1598) finally the cops showed up, the responding officers; Bobbb (see tape: "I know it's an unusual name, Bob with a B and an obbb, three bs") and Lopez, could not find the security guard, they said he probably would not be armed and in order to be charged with assault or with a terrorist threat he would actually have to have a gun and be capable of shooting me, I suggested that they charge him with Obstructing Commerce and Harassment, Officer Bobbb said that he would tell the guard in Spanish that guards are not allowed to shoot me, the officers went to find the guard (see tape, 17410-1599)
By then my phone service provider had left for the day. I bought a Tai Tea, the inside Mom Supermarket security guard said that he had seen a gun in the new parking lot security guard's belt. I called the police to say that I was leaving. The 911 dispatcher, astonished asked, "He threatened to shoot you, were you committing a crime?" I said, "No, I was parking my bike!" The dispatcher told me to wait until I see the guard and then call 911. I bought a fish on sale, and waited for the Market to fry it.
This is the same security guard who squared off with me, on Saturday April 22, 2017, the day before the first arrest, in retrospect I realized that he harassed me every time that I was at the Market, I never notice if he had a gun, but looking back, he displayed his holstered gun (as pictured below) every time, he is noisy and obnoxious, so I always just walked away.
Patrol Officer Gutierrez, not to be confused with IA Officer Gutierrez, never showed up, I called 911 to tell the dispatcher that I was leaving, she was angry, "What do you want this time! You have called four times!" We were disconnected, I called back, a different dispatcher told me that the officers had made contact, I told her that Officers Bobbb and Lopez, had showed up but never found the guard, Gutierrez never showed up, she gave me a different number to call. (4211). I left. My voice activated tape recorder documented the incident.
From: CaSantaAnaPd@coplogic.com
Your online report has been successfully received and the
tracking number is T17001643.
You will be notified via email of any problems with your
report. Once your report is approved, it will be issued
a case number and you will receive a PDF copy as an attachment
in your email within approximately five business days.
Thank you for using our online reporting system and please
contact us with any suggestions you have for improving our
system.
Online Officer
Santa Ana Police Department
Approval is contingent on how much information is augmental; if they already have all of the facts and do not need you to provide any additional facts they don't assign a case number, because there already is one. If, on the other hand, they consider this a fresh case, you get a case number. The responding officer, Lopez and Bobbb did not give me a case number, or an incident report number, so, who knows what the online officer will decide to do. Your guess is as good as mind. It's a private club, the tax payers are not members, and disfavored non initiates like me usually get their calls swept under the rug, particularly if Bobbb's name is something else entirely, 'failure to identify,' is misconduct; Bobbb's buds at Online, will not want to get Bobbb in any trouble, so, they will get back to me with, 'sorry we can't help you, you have no case, you will not be getting a case number.'
The Plot Thickens:
I did get a response from Online, (May 4, 2017, below) and apparently they know that the responding officers screwed up, because they do not want to follow up with me:
From: CaSantaAnaPd@coplogic.com
5/4/2017
We're sorry the following problem was found during review of your submitted report T17001643: THERE IS NO NEED TO DO A CRIME TIP REPORT, THERE WAS NO CRIME AND OFFICERS RESPONDED TO THE SCENE REGARDING A DISTURBANCE CALL (MASTER INC. # 170500983.
Thank you,
Online Officer
Santa Ana Police Department
I have come to expect disappointment when dealing with the police:
Power Corrupts: When you encounter the police you have to brace yourself for the fact that the police never 'police' the police. Just take a deep breath and keep going, eventually all of that accumulated snarkiness and flaming that they ladle on adds up to an indictment against them, they always snare themselves in their own arrogant web, remember: "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" is the best known quotation of the 19th century British politician Lord Acton.
The police have the power to kill their detractors, and anyone else who they don't like or can get something off of. Don't be discourage, many brave people have died for our civil rights, at the hand of the police, if you are killed you are in good company, when they are killed they rot in hell. Until then, the personal is political, fight to hold your ground, and eventually you will re-establish ground that everyone needs and that we are entitled to as Americans. It's not as hard as it seems, in the days of a life, to just hold on to your rights that the police swore to uphold as delineated in the Constitution but ignore when it comes to making arrests. Their favorite adage is 'I was doing my duty, I was following orders, I was going by the book,' and we know how that went over at the Nuremberg Trials. Take The High Ground, you do not need their authority or cooperation to do the right thing, and you will never get their endorsement: If you did it would be an indictment; they are The Gang in Blue. They bond over ruining the lives of everyone who is not in their gang. It doesn't matter just keep going.Any way what the Online officer means is that she does not want to hear the tapes because then she would have to report Bobbb, Lopez, and Gutierrez for misconduct. Fine. The judge in the fed case will read the transcripts and it will compound SAPD's lack inability to defend against both False Arrests. Cops have a favorite phrase, 'we iced his balls.' I don't have balls but I get their drift; they had a plot and it carried out toward chilling the target. There is no worse feeling than knowing you are going to die, unless it's iced balls; I;ll never know. Having that hand stuck in my face like a gun over and over, "Pish, Pish, Pish, was probably about the same feeling as having 'iced balls,' having to be subjected to that horrible feeling again when subjected to Online's all cap flame, "THERE WAS NO CRIME AND OFFICERS RESPONDED TO THE SCENE REGARDING A DISTURBANCE CALL..." is unconscionable. Assault is a crime, it usually leads to battery, sometimes murder. The email is intended to grip the reader with fear and make that person FEEL the power of the police, sort of the way six year olds want ants to feel the power of the magnifying glass.
One of the odd things that the dispatcher asked me was, "Do you ride your bike all the way from Orange! Why?" I explained, that I'm Buddhist, and the Market is in Little Saigon, a Buddhist community. But, that is not the main attraction, the view along the Santa River Bike Trail, is the real draw: Of course it was better when the river was not lines with drug addicts. The particular dispatcher at issue, never let me say a work, she was completely enthralled in her oratory, which probably was some sort of tactic to further the boot. When cops campaign against you, they all want to get a punch in. Hers was a long soliloquy on what she would do if she were me, "If I wanted peace in my life I wouldn't come to a place where the guard is threatening me..." Well, all of that will be entered into evidence in the False Arrest case, which, I am guessing is going to be more about the upcoming arrest, probably tomorrow night, in which I am imagining they have devised to inflict bodily harm. So far material harm has not worked: Officer Poling's partner tossed my storage key into the trash when I asked him to let me take it with me to jail. He also pinched an opened pack of gum and mouthwash, he then threw my bags into the trunk of their squad car as if pitching basket balls. Officer Buchannan left my bike for his gang buds to steal. That was his Mexican partners doing. Buchannan packed all of the groceries that were on my bike handle bars into my computer bag, you can imagine the mess, surprisingly the computer still opened and actually worked, to spite the game plan. Everything that popped open, like a bottle of hydrogen peroxide, leaked out in the other direction. They had fun.
The ride is exquisite; if the police were not such a bunch of buffoons maybe they could just get out of my face and let me live my life in accordance with the rights of every citizen, but they think that they should pick off victims, and that I am their victim du jour. Let that be a lesson in life for them! It's a simple equation: Harass an Artist; Lose Your Badge.
Speaking of the Santa Ana River Bike Trail: While the cat is away the mice will play: Morgan, Brooke's best friend, told me today (May 4, 2017) that Brook is in Canada for a week. He also mentioned that the case she brought on behalf of the five homeless drug addicts, has tanked, two of whom live in the Camp Cash Grab meth colony. Brooke sued under a federal code section because the junkies' stuff was carted away by the County landscapers, it seems that the County is willing to pay $200 per junky to settle, Brooke is asking for three grand each. Morgan confided that the County is going to change it's offer to zero and Brooke does not care because she brought the case in order to rack up court costs; winning is neither here nor there, "the stuff was garbage, three thousand dollar garbage, the county won't pay that, she just wants the court costs so that she can fund other cases." Apparently the case is over, in that the court costs have already been paid, at least in part, which is, I guess, how she managed to afford a vacation to Canada. (see tape 170411-1614). Maybe I will get to draw in peace again:
Brooke has not done anything that any other lawyer would not do, lawyers always grab the cash, but I have a hard time recommending her for other fed cases, of which their are plenty in the homeless community, because, if she were any good, or had the potential to bring a legitimate case, nothing would stop her, from continuing on this case, until she wins and the decision is published as a precedent. Good lawyers never bring a case in order to just churn court costs out of the Defendant, but crappy lawyers always go after deep pocket public entities, because win or loose, they grab a token settlement and court costs. If she settles, the case will not be published and there will be no new law on the books as precedent, fuck you very much Brooke: All of those easily led junkies will have been suckered into imagining that they have a right to live on public property, when in fact, without a win, they will be arrested:
The one case that is on the books, the one that Brooke used as precedent law for her case, "Levin" lost, so all it's good for is demonstrating that fed land is open to squatters. County land is not, in this case County land is being co-opted for squatters under the theory that the argument in Levin can be applied to County land as well as federal land, but Levin was not about that, the decision in Levin regarding fed land is actually incidental to Levin, without a win to make that a law, we are right back where we started. A good lawyer would be in it to change the law with a new precedent setting case, Brooke is in it to churn out a bunch of ridiculous motions for which she will get a lot of money in court costs as part of the settlement; a very good indication that she is addicted to something, if not cash, probably cocaine, speed, pot, and or, Ritalin.
Morgan said that there is no way Brooke would continue with the case, because if she doesn't accept the County's offer to settle for zip, plus court costs, the case will go on for eight years in fed court, and then after the appeal, it will go on for another two years waiting to be heard by the Supreme Court: Brooke isn't willing to wait for her money, certainly not for eight years plus two.
Morgan also said that no one is working on Brooke's cases with her, and that she has too many pokers in the fire: Again that is true of all lawyers, they all overextend themselves, Morgan mentioned that Brooke is too broke to work on anything until more money comes in from the Camp Cash Grab settlement court costs. I told him that those Plaintiffs have already promised money to their drug dealer, based on her assertion that there would be a settlement; she is in the camp every week having the Plaintiffs sign off on five thousand and three thousand dollar settlement demands so, she better get more than $200, if she expects the Plaintiffs to survive their angry stiffed drug dealer. The drug dealer has been waiting for his five grand for several months; because Brooke told her junky Plaintiffs they would get that much. Morgan said, "Brooke told them that she can't guarantee any settlement demand will be accepted." He also said, that they are drug addled and have never shown up in court, so they probably believed that the settlement was a slam dunk. He agreed that she is just blowing smoke.
This whole undertaking of Brooke's may not end well for her: All but one of the five Plaintiffs are strung out on speed and heroin, when their drug dealer comes after them for the money's worth of drugs he fronted to them on Brooke's promise of a large cash settlement, the junkies will probably kill her, before the drug dealer kills them. I suggested a go fund me campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment